Articles

2026 United States Proxy Season Review: Environmental & Social Issues 

Below are key takeaways from ISS’ recently released 2026 United States Proxy Season Review: Environmental & Social Issues.

The full report is available to institutional subscribers by logging into ProxyExchange then selecting the Knowledge Center and its Library tab and to corporate subscribers by logging into Compass then selecting Governance and the Governance Library or Governance Exchange tab.

  • Number of environmental & social (E&S) shareholder proposals filed and on ballot declined sharply. As of June 30, 2026, 275 E&S proposals were submitted to US companies, about a 43 percent decrease from the 482 that had been submitted by around the same time in 2025. After withdrawals and omissions, 162 proposals got on ballot, down from 239 at the same time last year, which constituted about a 32 percent decrease. 
  • SEC’s suspension of guidance on no action requests propelled proponents to engage in private negotiations with companies, leading to fewer public filings of E&S shareholder resolutions. Other factors for the drop in submissions may include the current political environment, the evolving regulatory landscape, a multi-year decline in shareholder support of E&S proposals, and improved disclosures by many of the S&P 500 companies that have historically been the most likely to receive shareholder proposals.
  • Average support for E&S proposals continued to decline. Support for environmental and social proposals continued to decrease, likely driven by the prescriptiveness of some proposals, the rising number of anti-ESG proposals, the politicization of “ESG,” and improvements in company disclosures. There were no majority-supported E&S proposals as of June 30th, down from five the previous year and continuing the overall decline of the last five years.
  • For the second consecutive year, “anti-ESG” shareholder proposals were the most filed type of E&S proposal. As of June 30th, 87 such proposals were filed and 59 made it onto ballots, down from the 119 filed and 66 on ballot at this time last year. As in the past, these proposals tended to question the value of traditional ESG considerations, and received low support levels overall. 
  • Among pro-E&S shareholder proposals, climate change was the most common proposal topic appearing on ballots, and political spending resolutions received the highest average shareholder support. Other key proposal topics included human rights, artificial intelligence, and various other environmental issues, such as plastics waste and biodiversity loss.


If you are not a subscriber, please contact sales@iss-stoxx.com (for institutional investors) or contactus@isscorporatesolutions.com (for corporations) to learn more about accessing bespoke governance research.

Authored By

Enver Fitch
Noelle Carpenter

The products and services described on this website are provided by entities within the ISS STOXX group and may be subject to different regulatory frameworks. These entities are separate, but affiliated, subsidiaries of ISS STOXX GmbH.

Stewardship Solutions, which consists of ISS STOXX Governance and ISS STOXX Sustainability, are provided exclusively by Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS Inc.”) an Investment Adviser registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. ISS Inc. provides its investment advisory services exclusively to institutional clients and does not serve the retail marketplace at this time. Additional information about ISS Inc., including its advisory services, fees, and conflict mitigation practices, is available in ISS’ Form ADV which is accessible through the SEC’s website at sec.gov and also our Compliance page.

All solutions under Indices including STOXX services, such as indices and benchmark data, are provided by STOXX Ltd. and are governed by the EU Benchmark Regulation.

The solutions listed below, which are offered by ISS Market Intelligence, are provided by Asset International Inc and/or its subsidiaries, and are not considered investment advisory services under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

ISS Market Intelligence’s class action solutions are provided by Securities Class Action Services, LLC and are not considered investment advisory services under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

ISS-Corporate services are provided by ISS Corporate Solutions, Inc. These services are not considered investment advisory services under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

This communication and all of the information contained in it, including without limitation all text, data, graphs and charts, is the property of ISS STOXX GmbH and/or its subsidiaries and is provided for informational purposes only. The information may not be modified, reproduced or redisseminated, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from ISS STOXX. All statistics referenced in this document are approximate and updated on an annual basis and, unless otherwise noted, relate to the year ending December 31, 2025.

None of the information included in this communication constitutes an offer to sell (or a solicitation of an offer to buy), or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial product or other investment vehicle, and ISS STOXX does not endorse or approve any issuer, securities, financial products.

ISS STOXX MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION.

©2026 ISS STOXX and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.