Press Release

ISS Challenges Unconstitutional SEC Request for Client Voting Information

ROCKVILLE, Md. (September 18, 2026) – Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) today submitted a brief in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania challenging an unconstitutional demand in a U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission subpoena that would require the company to hand over millions of lines of data reflecting its clients’ votes on sensitive governance and policy issues.

This is just the latest development in a yearslong political battle to silence proxy advisers and apply pressure on the independent voting decisions of their clients. The SEC’s demand for information follows an Executive Order issued by President Trump in late 2025 criticizing the proxy adviser business and demanding investigations and other actions against ISS. Several state legislatures also enacted nearly identical laws requiring proxy advisers to make government-mandated disclosures only on recommendations that conflict with company management. ISS challenged these laws as violations of its free speech rights under the First Amendment, among other reasons, and federal courts have blocked state attorneys general from enforcing these laws against ISS in Texas, Indiana and Kansas.

“As a regulated investment adviser, ISS has a duty to protect confidential client information, particularly when the government cannot articulate a legitimate investigative purpose for reviewing this data,” said Subodh Mishra, spokesman for ISS. “The dispute cannot be separated from the broader, coordinated campaign by government actors and outside activists to pressure proxy advisory firms — including through state laws that federal courts have already barred states from enforcing against ISS. They are now targeting the investors themselves based on their relationship with ISS and their protected speech. ISS will not allow its clients’ First Amendment and privacy rights to be sacrificed to government overreach.”

As detailed in today’s response filing, ISS makes the following arguments:

On ISS’ Core Business:

  • “Institutional investors—sophisticated market participants that may manage billions or even trillions of dollars for thousands of smaller investors—vote on thousands of proposals each year. To make informed decisions, institutional investors often hire proxy advisers to obtain research, analysis, and voting advice. ISS tailors its advice to each client’s own expressed preferences and priorities. ISS’ clients, in turn, determine whether and how to incorporate ISS’ research into their final proxy voting decisions.”

On the Scope and Nature of the SEC’s Demand:

  • “Thus, this data reveals ISS’ clients’ opinions on a range of highly sensitive and contentious issues. In more than 25 years of oversight, during which the SEC has examined ISS six times, the SEC has never issued a comparable request for such information.”
  • “The agency has articulated no legitimate investigative purpose for insisting that ISS turn over data allowing the SEC to determine how every single ISS client voted on every single shareholder issue for every single vote contained in ISS’ records for nearly four years.”

On First Amendment Grounds:

  • “Where clients communicate their voting objectives and strategies to ISS, many of which concern ‘public issues and political matters,’ their communications are ‘at the heart of protected speech’ under the First Amendment.”
  • “In this context, confidentiality is critical, as many of ISS’ clients may be unlikely to express their views as freely if they are concerned that their voting choices on sensitive topics will be disclosed, particularly to a government that disagrees with their votes.”
  • “The First Amendment chilling effect is even more pronounced with respect to other agencies. The Executive Order that launched the investigation against ISS also commanded a whole-of-government effort to target both ISS and its clients for adverse action.”

On Retaliatory Purpose:

  • “The evidence shows that the SEC’s request here is part of a broader campaign to retaliate against ISS and its clients for expressing disfavored political views.”
  • “Consistent with the Executive Order’s directives, the SEC has demanded that ISS produce information enabling it to identify investors who voted for positions that the Administration disagrees with. The agency’s regulations would then allow it to share the information with any other federal or state regulator. If, under this Administration, the SEC can use its investigatory powers to find perceived opponents, the same is true for the next—which could demand records showing who supported expanding fossil fuel use or opposed abortion and diversity initiatives.”
  • “ISS clients that have voted in ways that the current Administration might disagree with reasonably fear reprisal from the Administration. Indeed, some have already expressed fears of retaliation to ISS. The Executive Order specifically directs federal agencies to single out such clients for adverse administrative action. And the SEC has already begun conducting intrusive examinations of ISS’ clients, with the SEC’s inquiries specifically probing those clients’ voting decisions and their relationships with ISS.”


About ISS STOXX Governance

ISS STOXX Governance is a leading global provider of independent and objective shareholder meeting research and recommendations, providing multiple voting policy choices as well as end-to-end workflow solutions. ISS STOXX Governance leverages its extensive global footprint, deep experience, high-quality data and analysis, unified client support, and technology infrastructure to continuously evolve and extend its innovative suite of solutions to meet clients’ evolving portfolio, fiduciary, and stewardship requirements. 

About ISS STOXX 

ISS STOXX provides actionable insights through its comprehensive product offerings, proven expertise, and high-quality data that capital market participants around the world can use to inform their decision-making. Across indices, investment stewardship, corporate governance, sustainability, and fund intelligence, institutional investors and companies rely on us to help them manage investments, strengthen their governance practices, and bring new products to market. ISS STOXX, which is owned by Deutsche Börse Group, employs approximately 4,000 professionals operating across 34 locations in 20 countries. ISS STOXX’s clients include many of the world’s leading institutional investors and corporate issuers who turn to ISS STOXX for its objective and varied offerings. 
 

Media Contact

Subodh Mishra, Global Head of Communications
press@iss-stoxx.com 

The products and services described on this website are provided by entities within the ISS STOXX group and may be subject to different regulatory frameworks. These entities are separate, but affiliated, subsidiaries of ISS STOXX GmbH.

Stewardship Solutions, which consists of ISS STOXX Governance and ISS STOXX Sustainability, are provided exclusively by Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS Inc.”) an Investment Adviser registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. ISS Inc. provides its investment advisory services exclusively to institutional clients and does not serve the retail marketplace at this time. Additional information about ISS Inc., including its advisory services, fees, and conflict mitigation practices, is available in ISS’ Form ADV which is accessible through the SEC’s website at sec.gov and also our Compliance page.

All solutions under Indices including STOXX services, such as indices and benchmark data, are provided by STOXX Ltd. and are governed by the EU Benchmark Regulation.

The solutions listed below, which are offered by ISS Market Intelligence, are provided by Asset International Inc and/or its subsidiaries, and are not considered investment advisory services under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

ISS Market Intelligence’s class action solutions are provided by Securities Class Action Services, LLC and are not considered investment advisory services under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

ISS-Corporate services are provided by ISS Corporate Solutions, Inc. These services are not considered investment advisory services under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

This communication and all of the information contained in it, including without limitation all text, data, graphs and charts, is the property of ISS STOXX GmbH and/or its subsidiaries and is provided for informational purposes only. The information may not be modified, reproduced or redisseminated, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from ISS STOXX. All statistics referenced in this document are approximate and updated on an annual basis and, unless otherwise noted, relate to the year ending December 31, 2025.

None of the information included in this communication constitutes an offer to sell (or a solicitation of an offer to buy), or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial product or other investment vehicle, and ISS STOXX does not endorse or approve any issuer, securities, financial products.

ISS STOXX MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION.

©2026 ISS STOXX and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.